· 3/5/1985
Smith v. Central Soya of Athens, Inc.
Citations
- 604 F. Supp. 518
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22073
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a promissory statement of future intent which does not come to fruition is not an unfair or deceptive practice
- holding that “expressions of belief or opinion regarding the future of plaintiffs’ and defendants’ respective businesses” and “promissory statement[s] of future intent” do not violate the UDTPA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James C. Fox
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.