Skip to main content
· 3/5/1985

Smith v. Central Soya of Athens, Inc.

Citations

  • 604 F. Supp. 518
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a promissory statement of future intent which does not come to fruition is not an unfair or deceptive practice
  • holding that “expressions of belief or opinion regarding the future of plaintiffs’ and defendants’ respective businesses” and “promissory statement[s] of future intent” do not violate the UDTPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James C. Fox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.