Smith v. Cavitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the exercise of fourth-prong discretion is appropriate when there is a significant disparity in time to be served and the presence of an additional element that “raises a 5 The government’s April 25, 2018 28(j
• “The significant point is that the money-laundering offense level was entirely dependent on the drug-trafficking level”
• “Our conclusion that the district court erred can be reached by a straightforward application of the guidelines, and any error that can be identified purely by an uncomplicated resort to the language of the guidelines is plain.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).