Skip to main content
· 3/15/1960

Smith v. Cavanagh

Citations

  • 10 A.D.2d 682
  • 197 N.Y.S.2d 837
  • 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that shareholder agreement regarding salary increases was unenforceable because it was not included in the articles of association
  • enjoining issuance of stock when defendant weis unable to offer vEdid business reason for doing so Emd it would undercut plaintiffs ability to protect interests
  • noting that it is valid to reward key employees
  • noting that it is valid to reward key employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.