Smith v. Caudill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that there is a “presumption that the losing party will pay costs” (citation omitted)
• allowing costs of the transcript from the pretrial conference where written orders on motions in limine incorporated the discussion at the final pretrial conference
• \A party forfeits any post-trial challenge to opposing counsel's arguments by failing to object at trial.\
• “The cost of video recording and stenographic transcription may be taxed, provided that both are reasonable and necessary.”
• “A prevailing party may recover photocopying costs for documents provided to the court or the other parties, but not for those made for its own 22 convenience.”
• “A prevailing party can recover for transcripts under section 1920(2), including ‘trial transcripts and transcripts from other court proceedings necessarily 2 See dkt. 169 at 2-9. One visit was made in July for witness V. Neita (all dates were 2021

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).