Smith v. CAPITOL MFG. CO., a DIV. OF HARSCO CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff's claim of wrongful discharge, i.e., that he is entitled to relief under the promissory estoppel exception to the employment “at-will” doctrine, is preempted by § 301

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).