· 9/22/1997
Smith v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
Citations
- 977 F. Supp. 496
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14769
- 1997 WL 594947
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that allegations the a federal prosecutor violated constitutional rights to exculpatory evidence are better addressed by the district court where the plaintiff was convicted.
- finding Exemption 7(E) withholding inappropriate because agency merely claimed that it withheld \details\ of various techniques not already known to the general public
- finding Exemption 7(E) withholding inappropriate because agency merely claimed that it withheld “details” of various techniques not already known to the general public
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paul L. Friedman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.