Skip to main content
· 9/22/1997

Smith v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms

Citations

  • 977 F. Supp. 496
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14769
  • 1997 WL 594947

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that allegations the a federal prosecutor violated constitutional rights to exculpatory evidence are better addressed by the district court where the plaintiff was convicted.
  • finding Exemption 7(E) withholding inappropriate because agency merely claimed that it withheld \details\ of various techniques not already known to the general public
  • finding Exemption 7(E) withholding inappropriate because agency merely claimed that it withheld “details” of various techniques not already known to the general public

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul L. Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.