Smith v. Bubak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming exclusion of expert evidence because “a purely relative finding of tPA’s effectiveness” did not show how tPA would “more likely than not cause the patient to improve” (emphasis added)
• “To satisfy the relevance requirement, the proponent must show that the expert’s reasoning or methodology was applied properly to the facts at issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).