Skip to main content
· 5/5/1909

Smith v. Board of Supervisors

Citations

  • 116 N.Y.S. 1148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Pereira did not \suggest[ ] that a failure to specify the date and time of removal proceedings in 8 U.S.C. § 1229 (a) voids the commencement of removal proceedings\
  • declining to read Pereira as applying more broadly than in stop-time rule cancellation cases
  • declining to read Pereira as applying more broadly than in stop-time rule cancellation cases
  • declining to read Pereira as applying more broadly than in stop-time rule cancellation cases
  • “Thus, as a result of the Immigration Court’s pending removal proceedings against Plaintiff, his APA claim is not ripe for adjudication, and this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear his APA claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.