Smith v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to appear at trial was not consciously indifferent when party’s attorney requested continuance and mistakenly understood continuance would be granted
• holding that failure to appear at trial was not consciously indifferent when party’s attorney requested continuance and mistakenly understood continuance would be granted
• holding that failure to appear at trial was not consciously indifferent when party‘s attorney requested continuance and mistakenly understood continuance would be granted
• holding that though lawyer was not as conscientious as he could have been, his actions did not amount to conscious indifference
• holding that a failure to appear at trial was not consciously indifferent when the party’s attorney requested a continuance and mistakenly understood that a continuance would be granted
• holding that a failure to appear at trial was not consciously indifferent when the party‘s attorney requested a continuance and mistakenly understood that a continuance would be granted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).