Smith v. Aurora Public Schools

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no physician-patient privilege exists action with federal claims, including § 1983
• waiver of privilege by disclosure confined to \that specific subject during that particular conversation\; quoting Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. Blondis, 412 F. Supp. at 289
• “By failing to make a timely objection, [the client] waived any privilege that may have existed with respect to the statements”
• By failing to make a timely objection, the client waived any privilege that may have existed with respect to the statements.
• attorney waives client’s privilege when he fails to object to deposition question posed to former employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).