Skip to main content
· 6/23/2000

Smith v. Aqua-Flo, Inc.

Citations

  • 23 S.W.3d 473
  • 2000 WL 553295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding directed verdict on design-defect claim was proper
  • “If the Smiths introduced some evidence on each of the elements for design defect, the trial court erred in granting Aqua- Flo’s motion for directed verdict.”
  • “If the Smiths introduced some evidence on each of the elements for design defect, the trial court erred in granting Aqua-Flo’s motion for directed verdict.”
  • evidence sufficient to uphold directed verdict for defendant in 12 design defect case when plaintiff failed to offer testimony of economic feasibility of an alternate design of hot tub pump
  • requiring separate proof for technological and economic feasibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tim Taft

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.