Skip to main content

Smith v. Andrews

Citations

  • 228 S.E.2d 320
  • 139 Ga. App. 380
  • 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that when the trial court relies upon inadmissible hearsay, we must reverse since we can no longer presume trial court relied upon legal testimony and discounted incompetent evidence
  • concluding that when the trial court relies upon inadmissible hearsay, we must reverse since we can no longer presume trial court relied upon on legal testimony and discounted incompetent evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stolz, Bell, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.