Skip to main content
· 12/9/1997

Smith v. Ames Department Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 988 F. Supp. 827
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20456
  • 1997 WL 793289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Analysis under New Jersey common law for trademark infringement is the same as under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. Hence, violation of the act leads to a finding of common law infringement.” (citing FM 103.1 v. Universal Broad. of New York, 929 F. Supp. 187 (D.N.J. 1996

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.