Smith v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the provision unambiguous and holding that the “intentional loss exclusion applies if Antoinette intended the act that caused the loss, i.e., setting fire to the curtains, regardless of whether Antoinette intended to cause the total loss of the home.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).