Skip to main content
· 3/17/2000

Smith v. Allstate Insurance

Citations

  • 726 N.E.2d 1
  • 312 Ill. App. 3d 246
  • 244 Ill. Dec. 405
  • 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the reason for the rule is “twofold: (1) the intent of an insured in purchasing an insurance policy is to obtain coverage, and therefore any ambiguity jeopardizing such coverage should be construed consistent with the insured’s intent; and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.