· 9/20/1999
Smith v. Alabama Dept. of Public Safety
Citations
- 64 F. Supp. 2d 1215
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14614
- 1999 WL 754418
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a lateral transfer is not an adverse employment action “anytime an employee [is] displeased with his or her transfer”
- holding that the reason for transferring plaintiff from one city to another had not been shown as pretextual when the decision was “the result of a well-documented departmental reorganization.”
- finding that “embarrassment” or a “bruised ego” from a transfer does not constitute adverse employment action
- finding that Title VII plaintiff could not establish adverse employment action, because he suffered no loss in pay, benefits, or classification, only great embarrassment
- finding that Title VII plaintiff could not establish adverse employment action, because he suffered no loss in pay, benefits, or classification, only great embarrassment
- involuntary lateral reassignment from Selma to Montgomery did not constitute adverse employment action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Ment
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.