Skip to main content
· 9/20/1999

Smith v. Alabama Dept. of Public Safety

Citations

  • 64 F. Supp. 2d 1215
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14614
  • 1999 WL 754418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a lateral transfer is not an adverse employment action “anytime an employee [is] displeased with his or her transfer”
  • holding that the reason for transferring plaintiff from one city to another had not been shown as pretextual when the decision was “the result of a well-documented departmental reorganization.”
  • finding that “embarrassment” or a “bruised ego” from a transfer does not constitute adverse employment action
  • finding that Title VII plaintiff could not establish adverse employment action, because he suffered no loss in pay, benefits, or classification, only great embarrassment
  • finding that Title VII plaintiff could not establish adverse employment action, because he suffered no loss in pay, benefits, or classification, only great embarrassment
  • involuntary lateral reassignment from Selma to Montgomery did not constitute adverse employment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Ment

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.