Skip to main content
· 12/30/2005

Smith v. Akstein

Citations

  • 408 F. Supp. 2d 1309
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38844
  • 2005 WL 3592146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s IIED claim because the “unwanted attention, comments, and contact” from defendant, a doctor, did not rise to the level of outrageousness and egregiousness necessary under Georgia law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffey, Hagy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.