Skip to main content
· 11/17/1930

Smith & Rumery Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 21 B.T.A. 352
  • 1930 BTA LEXIS 1867

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the propriety of in camera review of specific documents to determine whether the exemption applies
  • recognizing the propriety of in camera review of specific documents to determine whether the exemption applies
  • recognizing the propriety of in camera review of specific documents to determine whether the exemption applies
  • \[D]ocuments are protected from disclosure to the extent they are attorney `work product' under the civil discovery rules.\
  • investigative records exemption applies to criminal investigative records so long as the other criteria of the exemption are met
  • investigative records exemption applies to criminal investigative records so long as the other criteria of the exemption are met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.