Skip to main content
· 8/30/1984

Smith Oil Corp. v. Viking Chemical Co.

Citations

  • 468 N.E.2d 797
  • 127 Ill. App. 3d 423
  • 82 Ill. Dec. 250
  • 1984 Ill. App. LEXIS 2295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • injunctive relief requires that plaintiff produce evidence that former employee actually took or possessed trade secret information
  • injunctive relief requires that plaintiff produce evidence that former employee actually took or possessed trade secret information
  • where the party seeking the injunction has failed to establish a fair question as to the existence of irreparable harm, the issuance of an injunction is not warranted
  • where the party seeking the injunction has failed to establish a fair question as to the existence of irreparable harm, the issuance of an injunction is not warranted
  • customer information was not a protectable trade secret, but rather general knowledge, where access to the information was not restricted, employees knew customers’ names from general experience, and customers commonly dealt with more than one supplier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seidenfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.