Skip to main content
· 4/29/1996

Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc. v. Violette

Citations

  • 517 U.S. 1167
  • 116 S. Ct. 1568
  • 64 U.S.L.W. 3726
  • 134 L. Ed. 2d 667
  • 1996 U.S. LEXIS 2835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We could not hold pre-empt-ed a state law in an area of traditional state regulation based on so tenuous a relation without doing grave violence to our presumption that Congress intended nothing of the sort.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.