Nebraska Supreme Court· 3/1/1996
Smith-Helstrom v. Yonker
Citations
- 544 N.W.2d 93
- 249 Neb. 449
- 1996 Neb. LEXIS 36
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- proper amount of child support is determined not necessarily by parent’s earnings, but by parent’s earning capacity
- emergency jurisdiction of the PKPA and the UCCJA is by its very nature limited and confers authority to make temporary orders
- this court does not generally give weight to parent’s relationship or cohabitation with another in custody determinations unless it has some adverse impact on children
- Nebraska court had jurisdiction to modify custody order in Nebraska dissolution decree where mother and child moved to Colorado with permission and father remained in Nebraska, notwithstanding that Colorado court had assumed jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Caporale, Connolly, Fahrnbruch, Gerrard, Lanphier, White, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State on Behalf of Hopkins v. BattNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-01-30· cited 139×
- Brown v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-12-22· cited 132×
- Rauch v. RauchNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-02-19· cited 95×
- Smith-Helstrom v. YonkerNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-10-10· cited 94×
- Betz v. BetzNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-03-27· cited 83×
- Tremain v. TremainNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-07-12· cited 79×
- Edwards v. EdwardsNebraska Court of Appeals· 2008-01-15· cited 68×
- Boyle v. BoyleNebraska Court of Appeals· 2004-07-27· cited 57×
- Hamilton v. FosterNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-12-15· cited 46×
- Anderson v. AndersonNebraska Court of Appeals· 1996-10-01· cited 43×
- JOYCE S. v. Frank S.Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1997-09-23· cited 35×
- State v. Larry D.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1999-03-12· cited 32×
- State Ex Rel. Z. P. v. PorterNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-05-05· cited 27×
- In Re Interest of Floyd B.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1998-04-10· cited 12×
- Nadeau v. NadeauSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1998-07-21· cited 11×
- Paulsen v. PaulsenNebraska Court of Appeals· 2003-03-04· cited 9×
- Hassenstab v. HassenstabNebraska Court of Appeals· 1997-09-23· cited 9×
- Hoins v. HoinsNebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-09-01· cited 8×
- Palmer v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-04-12· cited 8×
- Carraher v. CarraherNebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-03-14· cited 7×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1988-01-12· cited 671×
- Kumar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-10-28· cited 111×
- State Ex Rel. Reitz v. RingerNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-01-21· cited 98×
- State Ex Rel. Grape v. ZachNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-12-09· cited 83×
- In Re Interest of LWNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-07-24· cited 64×
- Ritter v. RitterNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-01-12· cited 56×
- Ann C. Meade v. Frank O. MeadeFourth Circuit· 1987-03-03· cited 42×
- Schulze v. SchulzeNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-05-10· cited 39×
- Kennedy v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-01-24· cited 27×
- Lainson v. LainsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-02-01· cited 23×
- Christen v. ChristenNebraska Supreme Court· 1988-04-15· cited 20×
- Payne v. Nebraska Department of Correctional ServicesNebraska Supreme Court· 1996-01-26· cited 18×
- Mace v. MaceNebraska Supreme Court· 1983-11-18· cited 18×
- Range v. RangeNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-06-02· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.