Smith Fiberglass Products, Inc. v. Ameron, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court did not err in discounting an employee’s testimony about an instance of actual confusion that lacked the exact quote and identity of the speaker
• finding that the district court did not err in discounting an employee’s testimony about an instance of actual confusion that lacked the exact quote and identity of the speaker
• finding consumers purchasing conductive pipe sophisticated and discriminating and thus not likely to be confused
• finding consumers purchasing conductive pipe sophisticated and discriminating and thus not likely to be confused
• “Without hesitation we refrain from adopting such a recommendation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).