Skip to main content
· 1/4/1991

Smith ex rel. Smith v. Helgaas

Citations

  • 763 F. Supp. 1020
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7059
  • 1991 WL 85224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning the term \third parties\ in the arbitration provision did not include the defendant manufacturer
  • rejecting a defendant manufacturer’s equitable estoppel argument because “[the plaintiff] 18 need not rely on the Installment Sale Contract to prove his purchase of the vehicle, or for the ultimate 19 success of his claims”
  • “[T]he plaintiffs’ [breach of warranty] claims cannot 14 rely on the Installment Sale Contract, but must rely on warranties issued by [the manufacturer].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.