Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 8/15/1973
Smith Development Corp. v. Bilow Enterprises, Inc.
Citations
- 308 A.2d 477
- 112 R.I. 203
- 1973 R.I. LEXIS 972
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “ ‘absolute certainty in proving ... quantum [of damages] is not required’ ” and that the jury need only “be guided by some rational standard” (citations omitted)
- stating that \[t]he burden of proving sufficient justification for interference is upon the defendant\
- upholding the dismissal of a complaint where the abutters failed to prove an adverse impact.
- loss of prospective profits, if properly established, constitutes an appropriate basis for an award of damages in action for tortious interference with contractual relations
- evidence of profitability of nearby McDonald’s franchises held admissible to show lost profits from tortious interference with establishment of new McDonald’s location
- damages for loss of profits due to delay in construction of new McDonald’s restaurant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts, Paolino, Powers, Kelleher, Joslin, Doris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Astro-Med, Inc. v. Nihon Kohden America, Inc.First Circuit· 2009-10-22· cited 370×
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-09-15· cited 205×
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. HornungKentucky Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 148×
- Sakowitz, Inc. v. SteckTexas Supreme Court· 1984-04-04· cited 136×
- Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-01-17· cited 98×
- Mesolella v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1986-05-06· cited 97×
- Ed Peters Jewelry Co. v. C & J Jewelry Co.First Circuit· 1997-09-03· cited 89×
- Jolicoeur Furniture Co., Inc. v. BaldelliSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1995-02-06· cited 78×
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Estate of WessonMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-11-12· cited 73×
- Vickers v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-01-26· cited 69×
- L.A. Ray Realty v. Town Council of the Town of CumberlandSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1997-07-17· cited 64×
- Leoni v. Bemis Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-06-17· cited 61×
- Chung v. Kaonohi Center Co.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1980-10-08· cited 54×
- Belliveau Building Corp. v. O'CoinSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2000-12-18· cited 53×
- Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 51×
- URI Cogeneration Partners, L.P. v. Board of Governors for Higher EducationD. Rhode Island· 1996-02-23· cited 46×
- Regan v. Cherry Corp.D. Rhode Island· 1989-02-10· cited 44×
- Ocean State Physicians Health Plan, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode IslandFirst Circuit· 1989-08-21· cited 43×
- Sherry Ex Rel. Sherry v. AsingHawaii Supreme Court· 1975-02-05· cited 42×
- Kelaghan v. RobertsSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1981-08-05· cited 38×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anter v. AmbeaultSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1968-08-13· cited 24×
- Vita v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1969-03-25· cited 23×
- Ferrell v. ElrodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1971-01-08· cited 22×
- Standard MacHinery Co. v. Duncan Shaw Corp.First Circuit· 1953-11-16· cited 21×
- Stephenson v. Plastics Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-04-28· cited 20×
- Pfeiffer v. SalasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1971-06-30· cited 20×
- Brenneman v. Auto-Teria, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-12-15· cited 18×
- Long v. NewbyAlaska Supreme Court· 1971-09-14· cited 14×
- MacAruso v. MassartSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1963-04-19· cited 10×
- Paterson v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1966-02-23· cited 8×
- Manufacturers Supply Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1968-02-13· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.