Smith Development Corp. v. Bilow Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “ ‘absolute certainty in proving ... quantum [of damages] is not required’ ” and that the jury need only “be guided by some rational standard” (citations omitted)
• stating that \[t]he burden of proving sufficient justification for interference is upon the defendant\
• upholding the dismissal of a complaint where the abutters failed to prove an adverse impact.
• loss of prospective profits, if properly established, constitutes an appropriate basis for an award of damages in action for tortious interference with contractual relations
• evidence of profitability of nearby McDonald’s franchises held admissible to show lost profits from tortious interference with establishment of new McDonald’s location
• damages for loss of profits due to delay in construction of new McDonald’s restaurant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).