Skip to main content
· 2/26/1897

Smith Bros. v. Brabham

Citations

  • 48 S.C. 337
  • 26 S.E. 651
  • 1897 S.C. LEXIS 77

Syllabus

<p>1. Evidence. — If incompetent testimony is admitted without obj ection, it becomes competent, and if afterward the same kind of testimony is objected to and ruled out, that does not make the former inadmissible.</p> <p>2. Ibid. — Incompetent testimony brought out by a party will not after-, ward be ruled out on his motion.</p> <p>3. Ibid. — -Notes and Bides — Endorsement.—Parol evidence is inadmissible to vary, limit, or control the legal effect of an endorsement of a negotiable note before maturity.</p>

Judges: McIver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.