Court of Appeals of Georgia· 5/26/1999
Smith Adcock & Co. v. Rosenbohm
Citations
- 518 S.E.2d 708
- 238 Ga. App. 281
- 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2258
- 15 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 350
- 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 783
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding similar covenant, applying to all “former company clients,” was “an unreasonable partial restraint of trade”
- affirming holding that royalty provision in employment contract was invalid because it had no territorial limit and therefore violated Georgia law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harold R. Banke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. MouyalSupreme Court of Georgia· 1992-10-21· cited 122×
- Singer v. Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-12-01· cited 68×
- Fuller v. KolbSupreme Court of Georgia· 1977-04-06· cited 40×
- Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C. v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-17· cited 39×
- Dougherty, McKinnon & Luby, P.C. v. Greenwald, Denzik & Davis, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-06-30· cited 27×
- Chaichimansour v. Pets Are People Too, No. 2, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-03-20· cited 22×
- Club Properties, Inc. v. Atlanta Offices-Perimeter, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-09-18· cited 14×
- William N. Robbins, P.C. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-07-11· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.