Skip to main content
· 4/8/2005

Smidt v. Porter

Citations

  • 695 N.W.2d 9
  • 10 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1204
  • 2005 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 46
  • 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,922
  • 95 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1112
  • 2005 WL 783353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employee could not justifiably rely on an employer’s promise of long-term employment when the employee was at-will pursuant to her negotiated employment contract
  • holding “a trier of fact could choose not to believe [the employer’s] after-the-fact justifications” where the employer failed to produce documentation of poor performance
  • recognizing that the timing of adverse action may be “particularly suspicious”
  • holding fact that employer terminated pregnant employee the day before employee was scheduled to meet employer to discuss maternity leave was suspicious
  • determining that the Iowa Statute of Frauds was not applicable because the employer could have promoted the employee within one year
  • finding that proximate cause is necessary element for claim of fraudulent misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Streit, Ternus, Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.