Skip to main content
· 6/26/2001

SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.

Citations

  • 2001 UT 54
  • 28 P.3d 669
  • 424 Utah Adv. Rep. 8
  • 2001 Utah LEXIS 90
  • 2001 WL 709032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on Rissler and holding that economic loss doctrine barred subcontractor's negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims against members of the design team
  • “However, plaintiffs may recover purely economic losses in cases involving intentional torts such as fraud, business disparagement, and intentional interference with contract.”
  • “However, plaintiffs may recover purely economic losses in cases involving intentional torts such as fraud, business disparagement, and intentional interference with contract.”
  • “in the context of construction litigation regarding the alleged negligence of design professionals, a tort for negligent misrepresentation alleging damages based purely on economic loss is not available.”
  • the economic loss rule holds that economic damages are not recoverable in negligence absent physical property damage or bodily injury; economic loss does not include any claim of personal injury or physical damage to other property
  • economic loss rule barred subcontractor's negligence claims against a building's architect and design professionals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russon, Durham, Durrant, Wilkins, Taylor, Russon'S, Having, Howe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.