Skip to main content

Smart v. State

Citations

  • 153 S.W.3d 118
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 11513
  • 2004 WL 2954988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Nothing in Crawford suggests that the Confrontation Clause, which applies to criminal trials, alters the standard set forth in Mor-rissey for the admissibility of evidence in a revocation proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKeithen, Burgess, Gaultney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.