Smallwood v. Central Peninsula General Hospital, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that superior court may not “modify ‘any matters directly or necessarily involved in the matter under review,’ ” but does retain jurisdiction over “collateral matters”
• evaluating a claim on the merits after plaintiff's death because \this court will hear an otherwise moot case to determine who is the prevailing party for purposes of awarding attorneys' fees\
• “Failure to argue a point of law constitutes abandonment.” (citing State v. O’Neill Investigations, Inc., 609 P.2d 520, 528 (Alaska 1980))
• “Failure to argue a point of law constitutes abandonment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).