Smallwood v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Carmack “assure[s] the shipper a choice of forums as plaintiff’
• moving company considered “carrier of household goods and therefore prohibited from contracting around Carmack’s conditions.”
• “Following removal, service of process UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Case No. CV 19-8115-DMG (GJSx
• “the district court had 13 subject matter jurisdiction if at least one of [the plaintiff’s] claims was completely preempted by the 14 [federal statute]”
• “the district court had 20 subject matter jurisdiction if at least one of [the plaintiff’s] claims was completely preempted by the 21 [federal statute]”
• “[T]he district court had subject 9 matter jurisdiction if at least one of [the plaintiff's] claims was completely preempted by the 10 [federal statute].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).