Smalls v. Ives

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 15(a) applied to situations involving the adding or dropping of individual claims within a multi-count complaint
• “The language of Rule 41(b) is broader and more com- prehensive than the parallel language in Rule 41(a) . . . . [I]t is rea- sonable to assume that the drafters of Rule 41 would have included similar language in Rule 41(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).