· 12/23/1998
Small v. Horn
Citations
- 722 A.2d 664
- 554 Pa. 600
- 1998 Pa. LEXIS 2720
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that inmates‟ takings claims under the Pennsylvania Constitution failed because “although the prisoner no longer has possession of the property, he still retains control over it.”
- holding that inmates‟ takings claims under the Pennsylvania Constitution failed because “although the prisoner no longer has possession of the property, he still retains control over it.”
- holding that inmates‟ takings claims under the Pennsylvania Constitution failed because “although the prisoner no longer has possession of the property, he still retains control over it.”
- holding that inmates‟ takings claims under the Pennsylvania Constitution failed because “although the prisoner no longer has possession of the property, he still retains control over it.”
- holding that inmates‟ takings claims under the Pennsylvania Constitution failed because “although the prisoner no longer has possession of the property, he still retains control over it.”
- recognizing the substantial interest in the enforcement of reasonable rules of internal prison management to ensure public safety and prison security
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.