Skip to main content
· 12/23/1991

Smackover State Bank v. Oswalt

Citations

  • 307 Ark. 432
  • 821 S.W.2d 757
  • 1991 Ark. LEXIS 643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding dismissal of appeal warranted even where appellee was not directly prejudiced but appellant’s failure to timely file transcript delayed docketing of the record in the appellate court and prevented an appellate decision on the merits at the earliest possible date
  • finding dismissal of appeal warranted even where appellee was not directly prejudiced but appellant’s failure to timely file transcript delayed docketing of the record in the appellate court and prevented an appellate decision on the merits at the earliest possible date
  • “[T]he duty to order the transcript and to monitor timely the progress of the reporter’s office in transcript preparation is vested upon the appropriate appealing party.”
  • \[T]he duty to order the transcript and to monitor timely the progress of the reporter's office in transcript preparation is vested upon the appropriate appealing party.\ (punctuation omitted)
  • “[T]he duty to order the transcript and to monitor timely the progress of the reporter’s office in transcript preparation is vested upon the appropriate appealing party.” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.