S.M., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. J.K., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding psychiatrist’s opinion reliable despite psychiatrist not relying solely on medical-literature’s DSM criteria
• “A court may admit somewhat questionable testimony if it falls within the range where experts might reasonably differ, and where the jury must decide among the conflicting views.” (internal quotation and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).