· 12/8/1973
Sly Ex Rel. Sly v. Board of Education
Citations
- 516 P.2d 895
- 213 Kan. 415
- 1973 Kan. LEXIS 650
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court assumed that the duty to exercise due care for students existed and affirmed the trial court’s finding that no evidence of breach of the duty existed
- court assumed that the duty to exercise due care for students existed and affirmed the trial court's finding that no evidence of breach of the duty existed
- court assumed that the duty to exercise due care for students existed and affirmed the trial court’s finding that no evidence of breach of the duty existed
- the court assumed that the duty to exercise due care for students existed and affirmed the trial court’s finding that no evidence of breach of the duty existed
- student was assaulted by other students
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Habman, Fatzer, Schroeder, Channell, Jost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.