Skip to main content
· 12/8/1973

Sly Ex Rel. Sly v. Board of Education

Citations

  • 516 P.2d 895
  • 213 Kan. 415
  • 1973 Kan. LEXIS 650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court assumed that the duty to exercise due care for students existed and affirmed the trial court’s finding that no evidence of breach of the duty existed
  • court assumed that the duty to exercise due care for students existed and affirmed the trial court's finding that no evidence of breach of the duty existed
  • court assumed that the duty to exercise due care for students existed and affirmed the trial court’s finding that no evidence of breach of the duty existed
  • the court assumed that the duty to exercise due care for students existed and affirmed the trial court’s finding that no evidence of breach of the duty existed
  • student was assaulted by other students

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Habman, Fatzer, Schroeder, Channell, Jost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.