Slusser v. Laputka, Bayless, Ecker & Cohn, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that because the appellees’ praecipe to enter judgment was premature, “the prothonotary was without the authority to enter the judgment”
• stating that, had the appellants appealed from the judgment that the prothonotary lacked power to enter, “we would have quashed the appeals”
• praecipe to enter judgment was premature, and judgment was not final for purposes of appeal, where certain claims of plaintiff were still awaiting bench trial, thus the entirety of claims had not been disposed of by nonsuit or judge’s decision
• praecipe to enter judgment was premature, and judgment was not final for purposes of appeal, where certain claims of plaintiff were still awaiting bench trial, thus the entirety of claims had not been disposed of by nonsuit or judge’s decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).