Slusher v. Ospital by Ospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he current approach is to validate Mary Carter agreements ... but to require that they be fully disclosed”
• trial court's error in not disclosing settlement agreement to jury was harmless given totality of circumstances
• \[T]here is considerable authority to the effect that jurors today assume the presence of insurance.\
• \[TJrial courts enjoy considerable discretion in deciding bifurcation and consolidation requests under rule 42 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.\ (citations omitted)
• agreement must be disclosed to court and parties, then court should disclose the existence and basic contents of agreement to jury, which may include admission of the agreement into evidence
• agreement must be disclosed to court and parties, then court should disclose the existence and basic contents of agreement to jury, which may include admission of the agreement into evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).