SLR Associates v. Millville City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that teaming agreement between government contractors war- ranted analysis under the rule of reason
• noting that the nonparty in question “never asserted a formal interest in either 22 the subject matter of this action or the action itself.”
• explaining that the subparts of Rule 19(a)(2) “are contingent, however, upon an initial requirement that the absent party claim a legally protected interest relating to the subject matter of the action”
• adjudicating case would not require the court to “challenge the wisdom or legality of any governmental act or decision”
• “precluding multiple lawsuits on the same cause of action[ ]” is a goal of FRCP Rule 19
• noting that joinder under Rule 19 is a two-step inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).