Slowinski v. Valley Nat. Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prior case, even if it arises from A-0833-24 9 the same facts, does not constitute the \same suit\ pursuant to the law -of-the- case doctrine, particularly when a party to the later action was not a party to the prior one
• finding collateral estoppel does not bind party against whom default judgment was entered
• \'Law of the case' . . . operates as a discretionary rule of practice and not one of law.\
• rejecting collateral estoppel because prior judgment was entered by default

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).