Sloss' Exr. v. Levi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that a city ordinance was content-based on its face because it only applied to speakers that wished to “beg or panhandle,” and therefore regulated speech “both by its subject matter and by its purpose”
• explaining that \ Reed ... mandates strict scrutiny\ of panhandling regulations and striking down a similar ordinance
• explaining that “Reed . . . mandates strict scrutiny” of panhandling regulations and striking down a similar ordinance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).