Sloane v. Powell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing disclosure of CI where the plaintiffs presented objective evidence which called into question the very existence of the informant
• “The fact that ‘all of the evidence ... does not point in one direction and different inferences might reasonably be drawn from it’ does not justify judicial intrusion into the jury’s role in determining whether a civil conspiracy existed.”
• plaintiffs arrested and detained; charged with a number of felonies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).