Sloane v. Equifax Information Services, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a]rguably, the ‘one satisfaction rule’ does not even apply to FCRA claims,” 11 but declining to decide the question
• noting that the plaintiff “provided evidence that the distress was apparent to others, particularly her family” and alluding to the husband’s detailed descriptions of the emotional toll on his wife from specific events
• reversing denial of remittitur of $245,000 jury award for emotional distress and giving plaintiff choice between $150,000 or new trial
• applying the Knussman factors in a context that did not involve a deprivation of Constitutional rights
• upholding a jury award of damages for emotional distress when plaintiff presented evidence that the emotional distress caused insomnia and began to affect her marriage, including seeking a marriage counselor and contemplating divorce
• listing multiple factors to consider, including medical evidence and loss of income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).