Sloan v. West
Citations
- 50 Wash. 86
- 17 L.R.A.N.S. 960
- 96 P. 684
- 1908 Wash. LEXIS 671
Syllabus
<p>Marriage — Evidence—Sufficiency — Presumptions. The uneontradicted testimony of both parties that they were married by a minister authorized by law to solemnize marriage and that they lived together as husband and wife for some years, is sufficient to establish the validity of a marriage, even although there was to be overcome the presumption arising from a second marriage by the husband without having obtained a divorce; and it is not necessary to show the publication of banns, license, or qualifications of the minister, all of which will be presumed until the contrary appears.</p> <p>Same — Estoppel. One who has unlawfully contracted a second marriage while his first wife is living is not estopped to deny his second marriage, as against the administrators of the second woman’s estate and her heirs, upon final distribution of the estate, although he joined in the petition for administration, describing the deceased as his wife.</p> <p>Husband and Wife — Community Property — Lawful Marriage. There can be no community property without lawful marriage; hence where a woman contracted marriage with a man knowing that he had a wife living, and they agreed to keep their property separate in view of such relation, her heirs by a former husband are not entitled to inherit from her, as community property, any property acquired by the husband.</p> <p>Witnesses — Transaction With Deceased. The son of one of the parties is not incompetent to testify as to conversations had with the deceased, since a prospective heir is not a party in interest.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the interest must be a direct interest, present, certain, and vested, not uncertain, remote, or contingent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Estate of ThorntonWashington Supreme Court· 1972-07-27· cited 53×
- State v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court· 1950-01-06· cited 45×
- Showalter v. SpangleWashington Supreme Court· 1916-11-13· cited 28×
- Swope v. SwopeIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-03-31· cited 27×
- Carlson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-05-13· cited 23×
- Gamble v. RuckerTennessee Supreme Court· 1911-04-15· cited 22×
- Poole v. SchrichteWashington Supreme Court· 1951-11-05· cited 21×
- Engstrom v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court· 1919-07-08· cited 16×
- Sloan v. WestWashington Supreme Court· 1911-06-23· cited 14×
- Meton v. Industrial Insurance DepartmentWashington Supreme Court· 1919-01-06· cited 13×
- Weatherall v. WeatherallWashington Supreme Court· 1909-12-16· cited 13×
- Hewitt v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.E.D. Virginia· 1980-06-10· cited 12×
- Beyerle v. BartschWashington Supreme Court· 1920-06-10· cited 9×
- Payne v. PayneTennessee Supreme Court· 1919-12-15· cited 8×
- Sortore v. SortoreWashington Supreme Court· 1912-10-07· cited 3×
- Owens v. BentleySuperior Court of Delaware· 1940-05-01· cited 3×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Filley v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court· 1902-09-16· cited 34×
- Routh v. RouthTexas Supreme Court· 1882-12-21· cited 28×
- In re Estate of MegginsonOregon Supreme Court· 1891-12-14· cited 19×
- State v. HodgskinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1841-04-15· cited 14×
- Kelley v. County of KitsapWashington Supreme Court· 1893-01-17· cited 7×
- Hatch v. FergusonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington· 1893-10-06· cited 6×
- Case of DamonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1829-06-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.