Sloan Ex Rel. State v. Friends of the Hunley, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that all ambiguities, conclusions, and inferences arising from the evidence must be construed strongly against the moving party
• holding an appellate court generally will not pass on moot and academic questions or consider a case where there remains no actual controversy
• recognizing two exceptions where the court may address issues despite mootness
• recognizing two exceptions where the court may address issues despite mootness
• stating \the action must be one [that] will truly evade review\ for the mootness exception to apply
• providing an issue must truly evade review to fall under the exception to the mootness doctrine for issues capable of repetition, yet evading review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).