Skip to main content
· 6/22/1990

Slivinsky v. Watkins-Johnson Co.

Citations

  • 221 Cal. App. 3d 799
  • 270 Cal. Rptr. 585
  • 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 832
  • 1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, in order to succeed on a claim, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the employer's justification was pretextual and that the employer's motivation contravened public policy
  • stating reliance on oral promise was unjustified when contradicted by integrated employment agreement
  • stating reliance on oral promise was unjustified when contradicted by integrated employment agreement
  • absent ambiguity, question of whether a handbook is a contract is a question of law
  • absent ambiguity, question of whether a handbook is a contract is a question of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cottle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.