· 6/22/1990
Slivinsky v. Watkins-Johnson Co.
Citations
- 221 Cal. App. 3d 799
- 270 Cal. Rptr. 585
- 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 832
- 1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 657
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, in order to succeed on a claim, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the employer's justification was pretextual and that the employer's motivation contravened public policy
- stating reliance on oral promise was unjustified when contradicted by integrated employment agreement
- stating reliance on oral promise was unjustified when contradicted by integrated employment agreement
- absent ambiguity, question of whether a handbook is a contract is a question of law
- absent ambiguity, question of whether a handbook is a contract is a question of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cottle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.