Sliney v. Previte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that statute altering limitations period for sexual abuse of minor from three to thirty-five years and containing retroactivity provision violated defendant’s state constitutional rights
• following Keene in holding that a statute retroactively reviving expired claims of sexual abuse of minors did not violate due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).