Slemons v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he exercise of the power of eminent domain for [a public 10 purpose] is conditioned upon the necessity of the taking.”
• Stats. 1992, ch. 812, §§ 2-3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Virgil Barham v. Southern California Edison Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-08-30· cited 22×
• Cantu v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-02-09· cited 10×
• Kachadoorian v. Calwa County Water District
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-09-06· cited 9×
• State ex rel. Herman v. Electrical District No. 2
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-05-08· cited 2×
• Foley Investments v. Alisal Water Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-12-09
• Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. Super. Ct.
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-09-21
• Simple Avo Paradise Ranch, LLC v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 2024-05-23