Sleasman v. City of Lacey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fall effect must be given to the language of an ordinance, with no part rendered meaningless or superfluous
• holding that full effect must be given to the language of an ordinance, with no part rendered meaningless or superfluous
• agency interpretation not given deference because “claimed definition was not part of a pattern of past enforcement, but a by-product of current litigation”
• Sleasman is a LUPA case. Id. at 641 n. 2, 151 P.3d 990.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).