Slay v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the evidence was insufficient to prove that the defendant had an intent to permanently deprive the owner of his car, stating “the extent of damage to the car was of no probative value on the issue of specific intent, since its wrecking was not purposeful”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Schminkey
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1999-07-08· cited 209×
• Strong v. Nicholson
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1991-05-15· cited 65×
• Thomas v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 36×
• Deal v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1991-11-13· cited 28×
• State v. Smith
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 5×
• Blythe v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2013-10-15· cited 5×
• Richard White v. State of Mississippi
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2015-06-30· cited 4×
• Johnny Pool v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1997-12-01
• State of Iowa v. David Charles Miller
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2018-02-21